|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Biodiversity Conservation Plan for Papua New Guinea Based on Biodiversity Trade-offs AnalysisFigure legends
Figure 1.
a) Coded timber volume ratings for RMUs. Yellow is highest class, followed by orange.
b) RMUs (orange) having agricultural potential according to a simple index.
c) Overlap (green) of existing protected areas with RMUs.
d) RMUs (orange) with current high land use intensity.
e) Overlap (black) of RMUs with areas having highest priority in the Conservation Needs Assessment.
f) RMU overlap with human population density classes. Yellow is highest category, followed by orange and then purple.
Figure 2.
a) the current best set of priority areas
b) portion of proposed set that overlaps with high timber volume areas
c) portion of proposed set that overlaps with agricultural potential areas
d) portion of proposed set that overlaps with CNA priority one areas
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
a) relative complementarity values of the priority areas (yellow is highest category, followed by orange, then purple).
b) must-have areas (orange) in order to achieve the 10%-based target
c) all priority areas having more than half their area in the highest PNGRIS land use intensity class (orange)
d) priority areas having highest ratings for timber volume (yellow is highest category, followed by orange, then purple).
Figure 5.
a) 50 areas (white) are in the priority set, among all those areas (black and white) that have high timber volume per unit area.
b) six priority areas with very high timber volume per unit area (white) and the three areas (blue) that could replace these (while still reaching the target). Other areas having high timber volume per unit area are shown as brown.
Figure 6.
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||||||